<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Diana, Princess of Wales</title>
    <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/list.php?21</link>
    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>EN</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:24:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
    <generator>Phorum 5.1.16a</generator>
    <ttl>600</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 'Sex with Diana' complaint upheld</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22530,22533#msg-22533</link>
      <author>lady63</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Good but for all the good it will do.  Her reputation has been allowed to be dragged thorough the mud, no thanks in part to her silent former husband.  

Regards,
Lady63]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22530,22533#msg-22533</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Diana's designer reveals the secrets of the Princess's 'caring dress'</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22529,22532#msg-22532</link>
      <author>lady63</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Just more proof of where her thoughts were most of the time, and that was what would make the people happy, unlike Camilla who cares only for herself and those around her.

Regards,
lady63]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22529,22532#msg-22532</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'Sex with Diana' complaint upheld</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22530,22530#msg-22530</link>
      <author>LaDi</author>
      <description><![CDATA[http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/uk?articleid=4746097]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22530,22530#msg-22530</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 05:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Diana's designer reveals the secrets of the Princess's 'caring dress'</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22529,22529#msg-22529</link>
      <author>LaDi</author>
      <description><![CDATA[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/diana/3534976/Dianas-designer-reveals-the-secrets-of-the-Princesss-caring-dress.html]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22529,22529#msg-22529</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 05:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A letter from a 'lonely' Princess Diana on her honeymoon up for sale</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22492,22492#msg-22492</link>
      <author>lady63</author>
      <description><![CDATA[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1088721/A-letter-lonely-Princess-Diana-honeymoon-sale.html

It is sad to see these stories about how sad and lonely Diana was.

Regards,
lady63]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22492,22492#msg-22492</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 'Charles insisted his eggs were boiled for exactly four minutes': Royal chef reveals palace secrets</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22341,22360#msg-22360</link>
      <author>lady63</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I susupect he is.  The other article written in the Telegraph about Charles portrays him imho as a man who while passionate about certain things is essentially a whiny individual who is utterly unware how just ungrateful is truly is.  I guess we don't see ourselves as other see you, but in his case that needs to happen.  To me he was and is an 'indulged' person, wanting what he shouldn't have but getting it anyway and no one around to tell why he shouldn't and can't, but giving it to him anyway.  

Regards,
lady63]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22341,22360#msg-22360</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 'Charles insisted his eggs were boiled for exactly four minutes': Royal chef reveals palace secrets</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22341,22357#msg-22357</link>
      <author>LaDi</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Another article but with some extra info added.

Princess Diana's chef tells of dressing gown and tiara moment
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/diana/3417559/NEEDS-PIXPrincess-Dianas-chef-tells-of-dressing-gown-and-tiara-moment.html





&quot;He also revealed how he always kept three pans of eggs boiling on the stove at Highgrove when Prince Charles returned from hunting. &quot;The Prince like boiled eggs and crumpets for tea. But his eggs had to be boiled for exactly four minutes. His detectives radioed his ETA ahead, so I always kept three pans boiling - just to be safe.&quot; 

OK what stuns me about this is that they had to have three pans boiling at once just to make sure the egg would be boiling for exactly 4 minutes by the time Charles arrived home. I mean I can understand being picky about how your eggs are cooked. I am picky about my eggs, but if they just waited for Charles to get home and THEN put the egg in to be boiled for four minutes it would save all of this trouble and guess work. I mean Heaven forbid that Charles had to wait 4 minutes for his eggs??? Is he really that bad?]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22341,22357#msg-22357</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 'Charles insisted his eggs were boiled for exactly four minutes': Royal chef reveals palace secrets</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22341,22356#msg-22356</link>
      <author>LaDi</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Love the Valentine card! LOL]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22341,22356#msg-22356</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>'Charles insisted his eggs were boiled for exactly four minutes': Royal chef reveals palace secrets</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22341,22341#msg-22341</link>
      <author>lady63</author>
      <description><![CDATA[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1084451/Charles-insisted-eggs-boiled-exactly-minutes-Royal-chef-reveals-palace-secrets.html

It's nice to read a story where Diana is not torn to shreds. In fact you come away having the sense that she had a very 'earthy' sense of humour.  Charles just sounds a tad 'precious' and wasteful.

Regards,
lady63]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22341,22341#msg-22341</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Princess Diana's brother is set to appear in a reality TV show</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22294,22294#msg-22294</link>
      <author>LaDi</author>
      <description><![CDATA[http://www.hellomagazine.ca/royalty/2008/11/03/earl-spencer-speaker/]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22294,22294#msg-22294</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mary Clarke's Letters from Diana</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22088,22291#msg-22291</link>
      <author>lady63</author>
      <description><![CDATA[You make some very valid points tnt. Maybe it is just me, but I don't think I would be so kind to another woman, if what happened to Diana had happened to my mother.  Maybe  if Diana had had daughters rather than sons things might have been different (and I have only sons myself).  

Regards,
lady63]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22088,22291#msg-22291</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Diana's blouse to go on sale</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22282,22290#msg-22290</link>
      <author>lady63</author>
      <description><![CDATA[It is a beautiful and romantic blouse worn by a beautiful lady.  Imho it reflected the personality of the Princess beautifully.

Regards,
lady63]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22282,22290#msg-22290</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Diana's blouse to go on sale</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22282,22282#msg-22282</link>
      <author>LaDi</author>
      <description><![CDATA[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/diana/3372919/Dianas-blouse-to-go-on-sale.html]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22282,22282#msg-22282</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mary Clarke's Letters from Diana</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22088,22280#msg-22280</link>
      <author>tnt</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I'm pretty sure her sons have read and asked questions at this point. I'm also sure, they now just want their father to be happy. They were there. They saw the damage inflicted by both sides. It's imbedded in their souls. No one knows what they really feel towards Camilla. She's there. She's not going away anytime soon. Squabbles aside, it's just another family, dealing with a blended marriage. They get along ok, most days. It would be hard to balance Dianas good/bad side with Charles good/bad side. They BOTH did their best to annoy each other, and too little to try and understand.]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22088,22280#msg-22280</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 12:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Next in line: Earl Spencer's latest conquest is Bianca, Lady Eliot, widow of drug-taking peer</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22202,22204#msg-22204</link>
      <author>lady63</author>
      <description><![CDATA[He must have something that women find 'alluring'(though I am unsure just what that it) because with his track record any sane woman shouldn't or wouldn't touch him with a barge pole.  

A bit like the 'other Charles' even Camilla would not have looked at him twice if he hadn't been the Prince of Wales (and I firmly believe that).

Regards,
Lady63]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22202,22204#msg-22204</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:22:18 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Next in line: Earl Spencer's latest conquest is Bianca, Lady Eliot, widow of drug-taking peer</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22202,22202#msg-22202</link>
      <author>LaDi</author>
      <description><![CDATA[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1080435/Next-line-Earl-Spencers-latest-conquest-Bianca-Lady-Eliot-widow-drug-taking-peer.html]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22202,22202#msg-22202</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 05:51:56 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Farewell to the Queen of Hearts</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22196,22199#msg-22199</link>
      <author>lady63</author>
      <description><![CDATA[And she was thrown away because she would not tolerate a mistress.  Well shame on you House of Windsor, you lost your one chance for greatness imho.  There would be no thoughts of republicaism imho if Diana was still going to be the Queen Consort.  Wonder if her sons ever really wonder why their father had been so weak to place Camilla above Diana.

Regards,
Lady63]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22196,22199#msg-22199</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:32:56 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Farewell to the Queen of Hearts</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22196,22196#msg-22196</link>
      <author>LaDi</author>
      <description><![CDATA[A lovely story! 

http://www.beliefnet.com/Inspiration/Chicken-Soup-For-The-Soul/2008/10/Farewell-to-the-Queen-of-Hearts.aspx?=&amp;source=NEWSLETTER]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22196,22196#msg-22196</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:41:53 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How Diana's letters hinted at her future torment even when she was just a child, by her nanny</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22097,22155#msg-22155</link>
      <author>tnt</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Well, yes I did. Sorry if I confused anyone.]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22097,22155#msg-22155</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:11:36 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mary Clarke's Letters from Diana</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22088,22121#msg-22121</link>
      <author>lady63</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Maybe this situation should be pointed out to her sons, maybe then they might just have a more 'balanced' view of their 'darling' stepmother.  But then again they are cut from the same cloth as their father. 

Regards,
Lady63]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22088,22121#msg-22121</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:29:10 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BBC wastes £100,000 on Diana tapes documentary that will never be shown</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,21598,22107#msg-22107</link>
      <author>susannah</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I hear loud sighs of relief from CH.B)-]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,21598,22107#msg-22107</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:14:23 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mary Clarke's Letters from Diana</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22088,22106#msg-22106</link>
      <author>susannah</author>
      <description><![CDATA[This should be up on bill boards all across the land...]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22088,22106#msg-22106</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:13:11 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How Diana's letters hinted at her future torment even when she was just a child, by her nanny</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22097,22103#msg-22103</link>
      <author>LaDi</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Ok but to be fair, you changed the title on yours! LOL]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22097,22103#msg-22103</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:30:20 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BBC wastes £100,000 on Diana tapes documentary that will never be shown</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,21598,22100#msg-22100</link>
      <author>lady63</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Yes, why purchased it if their not going to show it.  

Is it way of 'shutting down' another tv station from airing it and therefore 'shutting down' Diana and her story, as an underhanded way to 'protect' the royal family and more importantly Charles and Camilla?

Frankly if Charles and Camilla had nothing to be ashamed of there wouldn't be this need to do this

Regards,
lady63]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,21598,22100#msg-22100</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:54:34 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mary Clarke's Letters from Diana</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22088,22099#msg-22099</link>
      <author>lady63</author>
      <description><![CDATA[...'His emotional attachment to her persisted, and that was as threatening to Diana as any physical relationship.''...

And imho Camilla knew this, this was her only weapon against Diana she had.  Diana may have had Charles, phyiscally with her for those few years he said he was not in a 'physical' relationship with Camilla, but in his thoughts he never left Camilla, ever.  Diana was right their were three in her marriage right from the beginning.

I am glad that someone could see it too, though it does not do Diana any good.

Regards,
lady63]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22088,22099#msg-22099</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:53:57 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How Diana's letters hinted at her future torment even when she was just a child, by her nanny</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22097,22098#msg-22098</link>
      <author>tnt</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Hahhahaha, I posted first. ;) See the post right before yours. See, I'm trying to be more active here! :D]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22097,22098#msg-22098</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:25:33 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Diana's letters hinted at her future torment even when she was just a child, by her nanny</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22097,22097#msg-22097</link>
      <author>LaDi</author>
      <description><![CDATA[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1078004/How-Dianas-letters-hinted-future-torment-just-child-nanny.html]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22097,22097#msg-22097</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:41:26 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mary Clarke's Letters from Diana</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22088,22088#msg-22088</link>
      <author>tnt</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Some insight to Diana. Mary cuts no slack for Charles. 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1078004/How-Dianas-letters-hinted-future-torment-just-child-nanny.html]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,22088,22088#msg-22088</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:26:53 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BBC wastes £100,000 on Diana tapes documentary that will never be shown</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,21598,22073#msg-22073</link>
      <author>susannah</author>
      <description><![CDATA[hmmmmmmmm........]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,21598,22073#msg-22073</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:32:57 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sarah Palin and Princess Diana</title>
      <link>http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,21727,22072#msg-22072</link>
      <author>susannah</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Hogwash... utter hogwash.... does that sound too radical?   lol]]></description>
      <category>Diana, Princess of Wales</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.royalarchive.com/read.php?21,21727,22072#msg-22072</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:30:09 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
